Reads & read-nots. Writes & Write-nots. Thinks & Think-Nots.
Paul Graham re: AI "So a world divided into writes and write-nots is more dangerous than it sounds. It will be a world of thinks and think-nots." Ditto for reads and read-nots…
This makes me feel even sadder. Paul Graham re: AI "So a world divided into writes and write-nots is more dangerous than it sounds. It will be a world of thinks and think-nots." Ditto for reads and read-nots…

The result will be a world divided into writes and write-nots. There will still be some people who can write. Some of us like it. But the middle ground between those who are good at writing and those who can't write at all will disappear. Instead of good writers, ok writers, and people who can't write, there will just be good writers and people who can't write.
Is that so bad? Isn't it common for skills to disappear when technology makes them obsolete? There aren't many blacksmiths left, and it doesn't seem to be a problem.
Yes, it's bad. The reason is something I mentioned earlier: writing is thinking. In fact there's a kind of thinking that can only be done by writing. You can't make this point better than Leslie Lamport did:
> If you're thinking without writing, you only think you're thinking.
So a world divided into writes and write-nots is more dangerous than it sounds. It will be a world of thinks and think-nots. I know which half I want to be in, and I bet you do too.
